CAFC-PTOAugust 19, 2026·2026-1978·Appeal dismissed; mandate issued August 19, 2026.
In re Printify, Inc.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Holding
The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal pursuant to the parties’ Rule 42(b) stipulation. Each side must bear its own costs.
Why It Matters
This is a procedural termination only, with no substantive patent-law ruling from the Federal Circuit.
Full Summary
In re Printify, Inc.
The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal pursuant to the parties’ Rule 42(b) stipulation. Each side must bear its own costs.
This is a procedural termination only, with no substantive patent-law ruling from the Federal Circuit.
Appeal dismissed; mandate issued August 19, 2026.
The order is nonprecedential.
The appeal arose from the PTAB, but the order does not identify the substantive patent issue.
The parties jointly stipulated to voluntary dismissal under FRAP 42(b).
The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal and ordered each side to bear its own costs.
non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture Hatch-Waxman / ANDA
non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture Hatch-Waxman / ANDA
non-precedential standing / jurisdiction
Key Points
- The order is nonprecedential.
- The appeal arose from the PTAB, but the order does not identify the substantive patent issue.
- The parties jointly stipulated to voluntary dismissal under FRAP 42(b).
- The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal and ordered each side to bear its own costs.